<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Gnome-Shell on My personal blog</title>
		<link>https://jens.dev/tags/gnome-shell.html</link>
		<description>Recent content in Gnome-Shell on My personal blog</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:10:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://jens.dev/tags/gnome-shell/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>gnome 3.0, just my two cents</title>
				<link>https://jens.dev/2009/05/08/gnome-30-just-my-two-cents.html</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://jens.dev/2009/05/08/gnome-30-just-my-two-cents.html</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Over the last weeks there were several discussions how to handle the gnome 3.0 release. There are a lot of different points of view out there what has to be done in gnome to deserve a 3.0 release.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;One fact that often seems to be forgotten is the fact that the timeframe for all this is something about a year. So some of the suggestions like switching the &lt;a href=&#34;http://gnomejournal.org/article/63/letter-from-the-editor-gnome-30&#34;&gt;core language&lt;/a&gt; of the gtk seem like a bit overkill to me. Personally I think the C language a good and solid base for gtk. It provides the performance and flexibility you need for such a framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
